Saturday, 18 August 2012

The posts Markabba doesn't want you to read

On his old StrictlyComeFlexing (SCF) blog, in addition to his lies about FlexingLads (FL) and me, Mark(abba) - aka StrictlyAgain - made two particularly nasty posts about a photographer and a video maker, falsely accusing them respectively of making illegal porn and abusing models.

When called out for this, Mark rapidly deleted the posts, and even made a "peace offer" to the photographer, by referring a new model to him!

These are not wild accusations, they are facts, as shown by the following screen caps.

Although Mark does not name those he accused in these posts, he did identify them to others in private messages. There is therefore a good case to be made that he libeled them, which is a civil offense.

Mark later deleted SCF blog completely, blaming a "troll" (me). In reality, all I did was to respond to Mark's lies about me, and to help expose his slanderous claims about others.

First (April 21), Markabba accuses a photographer of "rub[bing] paint on his models cocks", says I have "a fascination for teens", and that a video maker has lads model for him after getting them drunk. (3rd paragraph)

Two weeks later (May 4), Mark goes much further, claiming the photographer shoots nude photos of 16 year old guys smeared in latex and paint - in other words, he accuses him of making illegal porn. He says I post videos of "teenage guys with erections", and the video maker's channels were closed for posting "inappropriate videos". (1st paragraph)

These latter comments are really innuendos, meant to suggest we post pornographic videos on YouTube, which is untrue. However, the accusation made about the photographer is clearly libelous. Even though our names weren't in this post, by saying "those of you who do know who I mean..." Mark shows that he's named us privately.

Here's the photographer's response to Mark's May 4 post.

Just 3 days (May 7) after making these potentially ruinous allegations, Mark generously decides to call a "truce" with the photographer, "take back some of the things [he] said" - he doesn't say which! - and recommend a model use him for a shoot!!

And here's the thing - the model is 16 years old:/ What does this say about Mark's morality? Either he thinks it's ok to send a 16yo guy to a photographer he believes may abuse him - and declare so publicly; or he shows that his accusation was a malicious lie, which could have had devastating effects on the photographer's life.

There's also the question of Mark's motive. Was he attempting to set the photographer up for further false accusations? Did he want to impress the young model with his photography 'connections', in order to pursuade him to appear on his channel? Or did he consider both possibilities, depending on how events played out?

In either case, Mark attempted to manipulate the 16yo guy for his own ends.

A final mind staggering post (May 8). Mark dismisses the vicious lies he'd told just four days earlier as "just... bitchyness on both our parts" - allocating equal responsibility to the guy he'd accused - and hopes for his respect!!

As for what he says about me & my websites (2nd paragraph), I'll leave readers to judge for themselves.

No comments:

Post a Comment